Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2012No. S177046PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution grants a criminal defendant the right to confront adverse witnesses. That right is at issue in a trio of cases before us. (The two companion cases are People v. Dungo (2012) 55 Cal.4th 608 [147 Cal.Rptr.3d 527, 286 P.3d 442], and People v. Rutterschmidt (2012) 55 Cal.4th 650 [147 Cal.Rptr.3d 518, 286 P.3d 435].) Each involves the constitutionality of a prosecution expert’s testimony about certain information in a report prepared by someone who did not testify at trial.

Here, defendant Virginia Hernandez Lopez was charged…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. The People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. DungoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API