People v. Lopez
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution grants a criminal defendant the right to confront adverse witnesses. That right is at issue in a trio of cases before us. (The two companion cases are People v. Dungo (2012) 55 Cal.4th 608 [147 Cal.Rptr.3d 527, 286 P.3d 442], and People v. Rutterschmidt (2012) 55 Cal.4th 650 [147 Cal.Rptr.3d 518, 286 P.3d 435].) Each involves the constitutionality of a prosecution expert’s testimony about certain information in a report prepared by someone who did not testify at trial.
Here, defendant Virginia Hernandez Lopez was charged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- The People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. DungoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.