Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 18, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-0404PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge

Pro se Petitioner John Sweeney is currently incarcerated in the District of Columbia Jail. He originally challenged the legality of his detention by filing a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on February 12, 2016, which was assigned to Judge Rosemary Collyer of this district. Apparently believing that two rolls of the dice are better than one, he then filed this identical § 2241 Petition before this Court two weeks later. As the legality of Sweeney’s detention has already been decided on the merits, the Court will deny this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Katz v. GerardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Rhonda Baird v. Joshua GotbaumCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  5. Columbia Plaza Corporation v. Security National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Lucas, Jr. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Arnold v. HolmesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  4. Flores v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  5. Hudson v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API