Legal Opinion
Johnston v. Narmore
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1966No. Calendar 7, Docket 51,260PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
{for affirmance). Plaintiff’s action for damages for injuries received when the automobile she was riding in as a passenger collided with' the rear of defendant’s car resulted in an Ingham county jury verdict of no cause for action. Judgment for defendant was affirmed by the Michigan Court of Appeals (Johnston v. Narmore, 1 Mich App 160).
Plaintiff was a passenger in the front seat of an automobile driven by Lewis E. Preston as it proceeded north about 4 o’clock in the afternoon on US-127, a four-lane, divided highway. It was a clear day and the pavement was dry.
A school bus was stopped on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hunt v. DemingMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Huffman v. First Baptist Church of FlushingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Reetz v. RiggMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Sedorchuk v. WeederMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carreras v. Honeggers & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re Willey EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- O'Donnell v. H. J. Van Hollenbeck Leasing, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Partridge v. WilleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Vanderah v. OlahMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.