Legal Opinion

In Re Willey Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1967No. 1,978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

9 Mich. App. 245 (1967)

156 N.W.2d 631

In re WILLEY ESTATE.

PARTRIDGE

v.

WILLEY.

Docket No. 1,978.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 8, 1967.

Rehearing denied January 19, 1968.

Charles B. Gatesman and Joseph C. Cox, for proponents.

Evans, Boyer & Luptak (Basil M. Briggs, of counsel), for contestants.

BAUM, J.

This is a will contest. Wanda Partridge, the proponent of the will, is the daughter of the testatrix, Hazel Willey. Among the contestants are certain grandchildren of the testatrix. They are the offspring of the testatrix's son, Fay Henry Willey, Jr., who died in her lifetime. His wife is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hunt v. DemingMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. McKeand v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. In Re Cottrell's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Loree v. VedderMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. In Re Sprenger's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Butterfield EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re REISMAN ESTATEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In Re Dodge TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Parlove v. KleinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. In Re Parker EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API