Legal Opinion
Lee v. Schmidt-Wenzel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 26, 1985No. 84-5945PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
766 F.2d 1387
Howard K. LEE, Li Yu, Eileen Ku, and Enoch C.J. Ho, on
behalf of themselves and on behalf of California
Pacific National Bank, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Dietmar SCHMIDT-WENZEL and Gene C. Harter, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 84-5945, 84-5974.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 5, 1985.
Decided July 26, 1985.
Richard Burdge, Lillick, McHose & Charles, and Amy Branaman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Robert L. Ivey, Ellen Hodgson Brown, Evans & Harter, Los Angeles, Cal., for Gene Harter.
Lawrence M. Jacobson, Nancy A.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Ronald O. Nelsen Michael Bullene v. King CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sample v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Pharmachemie B.V. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Jarvis v. ReganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ruiz v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.