Legal Opinion

Wixom v. Bixby

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

. Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Certiorari by John R. Wixom to review the proceedings of A. B. Bixby, drain commissioner of Oakland county, in the matter of establishing a drain. From an order dismissing the writ, plaintiff brings' error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The following statement of facts is substantially taken from the brief of the attorney for appellant:

“Defendant in this case is drain commissioner for the county of Oakland, and successor in office of John Thayer. *480In the spring of 1899, a petition regularly made and signed was filed with Thayer' for the location and establishment of a certain drain in the township of Farmington, in said county. The drain commissioner took all the regular and necessary steps required by law, and petitioned the probate court for the appointment of at least three commissioners to determine the necessity for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Livingston v. MayorCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  2. Swart v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hill v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Paul v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Tabor v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hoffman v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. City of Battle Creek v. HaakMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API