Legal Opinion

City of Battle Creek v. Haak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1904No. Docket No. 150PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Calhoun; Winsor, J. Assumpsit by the city of Battle Creek against Harry K. Haak to recover money obtained by. fraud and deceit. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant was an alderman of the city of Battle Creek, and as chairman of the bridge committee had charge of the repairing of some of its walks, bridges, etc., for which he furnished the materials, bills, being filed, and allowed by the council from time to time, and afterwards paid. Suspicions of the honesty of the defendant having arisen, some members of the council made investigation of the items for which bills had been rendered by the defendant, and this led to the bringing of this, action to recover from him a large sum, claimed to have been paid for fraudulent items. A trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Merriman's AppealMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. First National Bank v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wixom v. BixbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spencer v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hull v. LarsonArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Beaubien v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hapke v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Markowicz v. PappasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API