Legal Opinion

United States v. 103 Electronic Gambling Devices

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 29, 2000No. 99-15675PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

This case poses the question, what is bingo? Cf. Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. Int’l Sales Corp., 190 F.Supp. 116, 117 (S.D.N.Y.1960) (Friendly, J., sitting by designation) (“The issue is, what is chicken?”). In particular, we determine whether an electronic game called MegaMania, manufactured and sold by Appellee Multimedia Games, Inc. (“Multimedia”), is “bingo” as that term is defined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721.

Appellant the United States thinks not. The Government claims that the terminals on which MegaMania is played…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stand Up for California! v. UsdoiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Artichoke Joe's California Grand Casino v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
  3. United States v. 103 Electronic Gambling DevicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Santee Sioux Tribe of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
  5. United States v. Santee Sioux TribeDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API