Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 28, 1961PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The plaintiffs applied to a judge of the Superior Court for the appointment of appraisers under § 16-236 of the General Statutes. A demurrer to the application was sustained and, the plaintiffs failing to plead over, judgment was rendered for the defendant, from which the plaintiffs appealed.
The application of the plaintiffs recited in substance that they are owners of real property in Nor: walk, that the defendant is an electric power company, that the public utilities commission granted *101the defendant permission under § 16-235 of the General Statutes to locate a steam generating plant in a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Bradley v. New-York & New-Haven Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Wilson Point Property Owners Assn. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.