Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. Interdigital Technology Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 17, 1996No. Civil Action 93-488-LON, 94-73-LONPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.
I. NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS
InterDigital Technology Corporation («ITC”) is the owner of a group of patents which relate to the field of digital wireless telephony. This, group of patents includes the six patents-in-suit, all of which originate from one initial patent application filed on March 20,1985. 1
ITC alleges that Motorola directly infringes, contributes to the infringement of, and/or induces the infringement of the patents-in-suit, both literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents through its manufacture, sale, or use of its digital…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Motorola, Inc. v. Interdigital Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Pirelli Cable Corp. v. Ciena Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- LRC Electronics, Inc. v. John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Caterpillar Inc. v. Detroit Diesel Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- Vergason Technology, Inc. v. Masco Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001