Legal Opinion
Vergason Technology, Inc. v. Masco Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 17, 2001No. Civ.A. 95-286-JJFPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
This action was brought by Plaintiff, Vergason Technology, Inc. (“Vergason”) against Defendants Masco Corporation, Vapor Technologies, Inc., and Summa Holding Corp. (collectively “Masco”) alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,037,522 (the “’522 Patent”). The parties briefed their respective positions on claim construction, and the Court conducted a Markman hearing on the disputed terms in the claim. This Memorandum Opinion presents the Court’s construction of the disputed terms in the ’522 Patent.
BACKGROUND
I. Introduction to the Technology Generally
T…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.