Legal Opinion
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Woodahl
District Court, D. Montana
Decided February 10, 1970No. Civ. 810PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BATTIN, District Judge.
In this action under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 2201, plaintiff railroad companies seek a judgment declaring certain Montana statutes unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. 1 Plaintiffs also seek to have de fendants enjoined from prosecuting any actions pursuant to the Montana statutes. A motion for summary judgment has been filed by plaintiffs with a brief in support thereof. With a supporting brief, defendants have filed consolidated motions which may be summarized as follows:
1. A motion to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- James S. CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. GREYHOUND BUS CO., INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellants-Cross AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Vernon J. Rockler & Co. v. Graphic Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- In re the Gap Stores Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Mudd v. BusseDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.