Nugent v. Adsit
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Delator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order allowing an amendment to a declaration. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
The relator asks for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to vacate an order allowing an amendment to the declaration in a suit instituted by John Bresnahan, as administrator of the estate of Daniel Nugent, against the relator.1
The declaration, as originally framed, counted on an alleged fraudulent transfer to the relator of certain personal property by Daniel Nugent, which transfer plaintiff claims he is entitled to attack in the right of creditors. A portion of the property described in the declaration and alleged to have been converted is an item of “ 953 *463bushels of wheat, $1,040."…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Gorman v. Judge of the Newaygo Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Bresnahan v. NugentMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by12 opinions
- LaBar v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Johnston v. Farmers' Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Bockoff v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- City of Detroit v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Jones v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.