Bresnahan v. Nugent
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
On the 29th of April, 1879, Daniel Nugent, hy bill of sale, transferred all his personal property to his brother Emanuel Nugent, the defendant, and immediately left the State. Daniel was last heard from in September, 1879, and after the lapse of seven years from that time letters of administration were issued to-the plaintiff. James Nugent presented claims, which were allowed against the estate, as follows:
1. A joint note made by James and Daniel Nugent to-John Nugent, dated April 8, 1876, and payable one year from date, for $191, less indorsements.
2. Two notes for $150 and $300,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Fearey v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Barker v. ClevelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Heineman v. SchlossMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Eyck v. WingMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nugent v. AdsitMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- In re National Grocer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Craft v. United States ex rel. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999
- Bresnahan v. NugentMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Bates v. Boyce's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1904