Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Farmers' Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1895PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Cyrus Johnston against the Farmers’ Fire Insurance Company of York, Pa., upon an insurance policy. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Upon the trial of this cause the defendant’s counsel objected to the introduction of evidence under the declaration, upon the ground that it failed to allege the performance of conditions precedent contained in the policy of insurance upon which the action was brought. The court held the declaration to be deficient, but permitted an amendment, and admitted the testimony offered. The policy contained a clause requiring action to be commenced within 12 months after the fire, and, this amendment being permitted after the expiration of that period, it was objected to as stating a cause of action…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People ex rel. Gorman v. Judge of the Newaygo Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Continental Insurance v. HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. People v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. KinneMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Doggett v. DoggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Stone v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Hinchliffe v. Wenig Teaming Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Popa v. Northern InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Marsh v. BurnhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API