Legal Opinion
Burke v. Fought
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 17, 1978No. L-77-121PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, P. J.
This case 1 raises the question of the constitutionality of the acts and proceedings of the Toledo Consumer Protection Agency pursuant to the power vested in it by the Toledo Consumer Sales Practices Act, Chapter 26 of The Toledo Municipal Code.
Mr. Thomas E. Fought, Chief Inspector of Weights and Measures, has certain prescribed duties and authority under the ordinance.
Section 26-7-30(2)(A) provides:
“2. In addition to any other powers vested in the Chief Inspector to enforce federal, state or local law, he shall have the following powers and duties:
“A. Exercise general supervision over the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goodwin v. County of SummitDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- City of Huber Heights v. LiakosOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Smith v. Goodwill Industries of the Miami Valley, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998