Interwest Construction v. Palmer
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Associate Presiding Judge:
This appeal arises from a rather complicated, multi-party construction dispute. Thiokol Corporation appeals the judgment in favor of appellees Interwest Construction and A.H. Palmer & Sons.1 We affirm.
FACTS
All parties acknowledge that the trial court’s factual findings withstand challenge under the clearly erroneous standard. See Jacobs v. Hafen, 875 P.2d 559, 561 (Utah App.1994). We recite the facts accordingly.
*95In the fall of 1988, Interwest agreed to construct a waste treatment facility for Thiokol. On December 1, 1988, Interwest subcontracted with…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Armco Steel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Estate of FlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Interwest Construction v. PalmerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.