Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Rosen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 21, 2025No. SC20950Published

1Opinion of the Court

SEAN MURPHY v. BETH ROSEN (SC 20950) McDonald, D’Auria, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js. Syllabus The plaintiff appealed from the judgment of the trial court, which had dismissed his defamation action against the defendant, and from the court’s decision to award the defendant attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute (§ 52-196a). The plaintiff claimed, inter alia, that the trial court incorrectly concluded that he had failed to meet his burden under § 52-196a (e) (3) of showing that there was probable cause that he would prevail on the merits of his defamation per se…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. La Liberte v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  4. Dorothy Stevens v. Dorothy Wright TillmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API