Legal Opinion
Finizie v. City of Bridgeport
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 29, 1995No. 3:95CV00308 (RNC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHATIGNY, District Judge.
Upon review and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 2 of the Local Rules for United States Magistrates (D.Conn.1995), this recommended ruling is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the ruling of this court over Plaintiffs objection.
It is so ordered.
RECOMMENDED RULING ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
MARTINEZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
Rona Finizie, a pro se plaintiff, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that the City of Bridgeport (“the City”) and others violated her rights under the Connecticut constitution, the Fifth Amendment and the Due Process…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Piedmont Gardens, LLC v. LeBlancDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- J & M Autobody, Inc. v. GavinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- S/N1 Reo Ltd. Liability Co. v. City of New London Ex Rel. BallestriniDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Speer v. New LondonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Tonina v. BerlinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020