Hartman v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Appellant Hartman and three others, Emerson, Roberts, and Whitehead, were convicted by the court, sitting as a jury, of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617 (Supp. 1973). They were sentenced to five years imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Appellant’s sole point for reversal is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict as to Hartman’s participation. We cannot agree when we consider the evidence, which is substantial, in the light most favorable to the appellee as we must do on appeal. Haynie v. State,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haynie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Murrah v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Llewellyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977