Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 10, 1977No. CR76-164Published

1Opinion of the Court

545 S.W.2d 606 (1977)

Roy Lee DIXON, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

No. CR76-164.

Supreme Court of Arkansas, In Banc.

January 10, 1977.

Kenneth Coffelt, Little Rock, for appellant.

Jim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen., by Gary Isbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.

GEORGE ROSE SMITH, Justice.

At a bifurcated trial the jury first found the appellant, Roy Lee Dixon, guilty of possession of heroin with intent to deliver, as charged. The jury then found Dixon to be a habitual criminal, with three previous felony convictions, and imposed a 40-year sentence. The principal question is whether…

Also in this document: Dissent · Fogleman; Dissent · Fogleman.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Graves v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API