Sklodowski v. Scott Paper Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
This diversity action arises out of the electrocution of Edward F. Sklodowski, III, plaintiff’s decedent, (“Sklodowski”) while working at defendant’s office building.1 Defendant Scott Paper Company (“Scott”) has moved for summary judgment claiming immunity from suit under the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act. The court heard oral argument on August 30, 1990, as to whether Scott was Sklodowski’s employer for purposes of the act. For the reasons stated below, we grant defendant’s motion.
The court shall render summary judgment “if the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scott Paper Co. v. Isaac Watkins Company, Inc. Sklodowski (Edward Francis, Jr.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991