Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 4, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Logan Countyj before ■John E. Burford, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court by

Bueavell, J.:

This case was■ submitted to the trial court on a stipulation signed by J. 0. Strang, the attorney general, on behalf of the Territory, and by Messrs Dale & Bierer, the attorneys for the defendant.

The record presents the sole question as to whether or not the plaintiff in error is bound to account to the Territory for interest in the sum of $5,603.00 which he received from the Guthrie National Bank for the deposit ■of territorial funds with such bank while he was acting as territorial treasurer, to which position he had beeu duly appointed. For some reason,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McFetridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. City of Chicago v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. United States v. MosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. State v. HarshawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Adams v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Baker v. Williams Banking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Winters v. Governor's Special CommitteeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Watts v. Bd. of Commissioners Cleveland Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API