Legal Opinion

(PC) Humes v. Roseville Police Department

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 6, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01109Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JON HUMES, No. 2:18-cv-1109 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. 19 § 12132. 20 On June 3, 2019, the Court screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) pursuant 21 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and ordered plaintiff to show cause…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
Tworivers v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.