Cataldo v. Winjack Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s denial of his claim for interest on the amount found *399to be due him from Winjack by the trial court sitting without a jury. The only issue presented is whether plaintiff is entitled to interest as a matter of right.
Plaintiff sued defendants in assumpsit for moneys advanced by plaintiff for the use and benefit of defendants at their request. The period during which the advances were allegedly made ran from May 1, 1953 through February 11, 1954, and the claimed advances totaled $6,096. This was the amount plaintiff sought to recover by his suit; no claim…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Feiler v. Midway Sales, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Gottesman v. Fay-Bea Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Bernstein v. ShifmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Green v. NeversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Rose Mary Green and Edniquech Grubbs, Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Malice Wayne Green, Deceased, Jessie Green, Claimants-Appellees, Ernest L. Jarrett, Attorney-Appellant v. Larry Nevers, Individually and in Their Capacity as City of Detroit Police OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999