Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Shifman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1960No. Docket No. 17, Calendar No. 48,273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Refer to Bernstein v. Shifman, 355 Mich 398. Subsequent trial to a jury resulted in a verdict for tbe plaintiff lessor in the sum of $10,000, tbat being tbe amount required by the lease to make good tbe defendant lessee’s covenant for improvements. Plaintiff moved for entry of judgment on tbe verdict ■with specification of right, to recover interest at tbe legal rate, on the amount of tbe verdict, from August 1, 1956, tbat being the date of breach as previously determined by this Court. Tbe trial judge denied such motion. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff is entitled to recover interest as claimed,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gottesman v. Fay-Bea Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bernstein v. ShifmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. RitzenheinMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Feiler v. Midway Sales, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Cataldo v. Winjack Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API