Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Reagan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 13, 1954No. 43972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

P. H. Cunningham, plaintiff-appellant, claimed $15,000 actual damages for an assault and battery which he alleged was committed upon him by defendant-respondent Reagan. There was' a defendant’s verdict and plaintiff has appealed from the ensuing judgment contending, inter alia, that the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict for plaintiff on the issue of liability. We think that contention must be sustained. We shall hereinafter refer to the parties as they were designated in the trial court. Defendant has not filed a brief.

Plaintiff and defendant had executed a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reger v. NowotnySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Hogsett v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Lehman v. LambertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Frank v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Adler v. EwingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Quinn v. RosenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Hartley v. OidtmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API