Legal Opinion
Rosales v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 8, 2007No. Civil Action 03-1117 (GK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are Walter J. Rosales and Karen Toggery. 1 Defendants are the United States of America, the U.S. Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA” or “Bureau”), and the Interior Board of Indian Appeals (“IBIA” or “Board”). Plaintiffs bring suit under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 (“IRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 461-479, and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, seeking to overturn the following: 1) the August 31, 1996 Secretarial election in which voters approved an amendment to the Jamul Village…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jamul Action Committee v. E. Sequoyah SimermeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Rosales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Rosales v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Rosales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Quantum Entertainment Limited v. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.