Legal Opinion
O'Gorman v. Haber
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided December 6, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRathbun, J.
This is an action of trespass on the case for deceit. The trial in the Superior Court resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $1,500. The case is before us on exceptions filed by each of the parties. The defendant’s exceptions are: To a ruling refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant; to the admission of evidence; to instructions to the jury and to the refusal to instruct as requested. The plaintiff excepted to an instruction limiting the amount of ■damages to $1,500.
The defendant was president of the Interstate Chain Linen Stores, Inc. The declaration alleges that he, representing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rothmiller v. . SteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Bradley v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- New York Land Improvement Co. v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Fottler v. MoseleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Alexander v. ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holmes v. BatesonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977
- Big Lots Stores, Inc. v. Bain Capital Fund VII, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- Conti v. Walter Winters, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
- Wilkenson v. LinneckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Cliftex Clothing Co. v. Di SantoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959