Legal Opinion

Countryside Casualty Co. v. Grant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 1980No. 80-79PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richard L. Mays, Justice.

An automobile insurance policy issued by appellant, Countryside Casualty Co., contained a clause providing insurance for newly acquired automobiles if all the automobiles owned by the insured were insured with the company. In a suit by appellee, Coy W. Grant, under the policy seeking recovery for damages to his newly acquired pick-up truck, which had been destroyed by fire, the trial court sitting as a jury held that appellant was liable for the loss, as well as a statutory 12% penalty and attorney’s fee, even though appellee owned a used car dealership which had an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. C. & A. Construction Co. v. Benning Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Southwestern Insurance Company v. CampSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. James T. Michel v. The ætna Casualty and Surety Company, and the Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Plambeck v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Commercial Union Insurance Companies v. Sky, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992
  4. Connect Communications Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. Allstate Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API