Legal Opinion

James T. Michel v. The ætna Casualty and Surety Company, and the Automobile Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1958No. 5708PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Michel, plaintiff below and hereinafter so referred to, brought this declaratory judgment action claiming that at the time of an accident his 1955 Pontiac station wagon was insured under the automatic coverage provision of a policy issued to him by the appellees, hereinafter jointly referred to as Aetna. The case was submitted on a stipulation of facts. The trial court held that there was no coverage.

Prior to October 3, 1956, plaintiff owned three automobiles. One was a 1955 Chrysler Imperial insured by Aetna under a policy having liability limits of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. James LoweCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  2. In Re Irvine's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Dunmire Motor Co. v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Waggener v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. ToneySupreme Court of Virginia · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Key v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Countryside Casualty Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Martin v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CAS. INS. CO. v. RitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Adams v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API