Legal Opinion

Ikpe v. Aramark

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 5, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00788Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION STEPHANY M. IKPE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:20-CV-00788-DGK ) ARAMARK, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS This lawsuit arises out of Defendant Aramark’s (“Aramark”) termination of Plaintiff Stephany Ikpe’s employment and its enforcement of a no-hire provision. Now before the Court is Aramark’s motion to dismiss Count II of Plaintiff’s complaint, seeking relief for tortious interference with business expectancy. ECF 20. The motion is DENIED. Background Viewed in the light…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Jenkins v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Arthur Gallagher v. City of ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API