Legal Opinion

Larson v. Emmett Joint School District No. 221

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1978No. 11975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

In this cause we are asked by Larson to reconsider Newlan v. State and Agost v. State, 96 Idaho 711, 535 P.2d 1348 (1975), and declare Idaho’s Notice of Claim Statute violative of the constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection of the law. Alternatively, we are asked to reverse a summary judgment entered in favor of the School District and remand for a jury resolution on the summary judgment issue as to when Larson should reasonably have discovered her claim.

Although our recent decision in Jones v. State Board of Medicine, 97 Idaho 859, 555 P.2d 399 (1976),…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Randolph v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. Maier v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Terrell v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of PrestonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McQuillen v. City of AmmonIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Blass v. County of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kifer v. School Dist. No. 394Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Driggers v. GrafeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API