Legal Opinion

Mann v. Leake & Nelson Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 28, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

Tho named plaintiff, an employee of Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries he suffered by reason of the claimed negligence of the defendant. The Raybestos corporation was permitted to intervene as a coplaintiff in order to secure reimbursement for workmen’s compensation it had paid or become obligated to pay to the plaintiff. When we speak of the plaintiff, we shall refer to Mann. The case was tried to a jury, a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed from the denial of its motion to set the verdict aside.

The jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Jump v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Variety Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  4. Memphis Asphalt & Paving Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Haynes v. Norfolk Bridge & Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Darling v. Burrone Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Wright v. Coe & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. R.A. Civitello Co. v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. Trainor v. Frank Mercede & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Nuzzo v. Connecticut Steel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API