Legal Opinion
Trainor v. Frank Mercede & Sons, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 15, 1964PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The defendants Mayer Gibor and Arthur Smith engaged the defendant Frank Mercede and Sons, Inc., a general contractor, hereinafter called Mercede, to construct a building on land owned by Gibor and Smith. The plans were drawn by an architect employed by Gibor and Smith to meet the requirements of First National Stores, which was to occupy the building as lessee. The plans called for, and Mercede constructed, an opening in the main floor, near the front door, to accommodate a conveyor to carry stock between the main floor and the basement. Before the conveyor was installed, and before the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Laube v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Bonczkiewicz v. Merberg Wrecking Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Ziulkowski v. KolodziejSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Royal Homes, Inc. v. Dalene Hardwood Flooring Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Lawrence v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Federal Steel & Wire Corp. v. Ruhlin Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Darling v. Burrone Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Wright v. Coe & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Leary v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Guglielmo v. Klausner Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.