Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Norfolk Bridge & Construction Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1934No. 28776PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

Laura Eleanor Haynes, as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Thomas Haynes, brought this action on behalf of herself and minor children, to recover damages because of the death of her husband, which she alleges was caused by the wrongful and negligent acts of the Norfolk Bridge & Construction Company. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the trial court, on motion of defendant, directed a verdict in its favor. Plaintiff has appealed.

*282We are required to determine from the record whether there was sufficient evidence to require submission of the cause to the jury.

In November,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. McCrorey v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  3. Memphis Asphalt & Paving Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Rengstorf v. Winston Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shupe Ex Rel. Shupe v. County of AntelopeNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gruhalla v. George Moeller Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Kliewer v. Wall Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stover v. Ed Miller & Sons, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Donaldson v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API