Legal Opinion

MidTexas Pipeline Co. v. Cusack

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 7, 2002No. 13-00-734-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice YÁÑEZ.

This appeal arises out of an attempt on the part of appellant, MidTexas Pipeline Company, to condemn property owned by appellee, Michael F. Cusack. The trial court dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction. We reverse and remand.

After attempting to purchase an easement from Cusack, MidTexas filed a petition for condemnation. Initially, the trial court granted a partial summary judgment for MidTexas, holding that: (1) MidTexas is a corporation with the power of eminent domain which has complied with all statutory prerequisites to filing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  2. Cusack Ranch Corp. v. MidTexas Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. City of Arlington v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. the City of El Paso, Texas v. Mazie's, L.P. and Whitney Properties, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  4. Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. the City of El Paso, Texas v. Mazie's, L.P. and Whitney Properties, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API