Rowan v. Howard Sober, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEITH, District Judge.
This opinion and order is in response to defendants’ motion to strike plaintiffs’ demand for jury trial and motion to change the order of proofs.
The facts of this case as disclosed by the record indicate that plaintiffs, Donald Rowan and Ernest Bergeron, are employees of defendant, Howard Sober, Inc., and are members of defendant, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America and defendant Local 299 of the beforementioned union. 1 Because of defendants’ alleged collusion, conspiracy and bad faith,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Bernstein v. Universal Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Atwood v. Pacific Maritime Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1977
- Coleman v. Kroger CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1975
- Kinzel v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.