Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Kroger Company
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided August 26, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-118 (R)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TURK, Chief Judge.
In this suit, Ben Franklin Coleman alleges that the defendants, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (hereafter the “International”) and Local No. 171 of the International (hereafter “Local 171”), violated the duty of fair representation owed to him by negotiating and executing a collective bargaining agreement with the Kroger Company which removed him from the Kroger Retirement Income Plan and made him subject to the union’s retirement plan. The Kroger Company is also named as a defendant on the theory that they…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Julus Newton v. Local 801 Frigidaire Local of the International Union of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Khan v. Grotnes Metalforming Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Atwood v. Pacific Maritime Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1977
- American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Headqtrs Local 6885 v. American Postal Workers Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- McDonald v. Rhode Island General Council ex rel. Public Service Employees Local Union No. 1033Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.