Legal Opinion

Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance v. Fischer Lime & Cement Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 1933No. 4-2948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Separate suits were brought by the Fischer Lime & Cement Company and the Big Rock Stone & Material Company against the Merrill Engineering Company and the Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance Company as the surety of its codefendent, which suits were consolidated and tried together, and a decree was rendered in favor of both plaintiffs against both defendants.

The Merrill Engineering Company entered into a contract with the State Highway Commission to construct a part of a State highway, and gave bond, as required by law, for the due performance of the contract, with the Consolidated Indemnity &…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Babb v. El DoradoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Mays v. Phillips CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Eubanks v. FutrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Arkansas Centennial CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Fort Smith Structural Steel Co. v. Western Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Berry Asphalt Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. McCain, Comm. of Labor v. Farmers Elc. Coop. Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Great American Indemnity Co. v. State ex rel. Ark. Bitumuls Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API