Legal Opinion

Department of Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms v. Galioto

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1986No. 84-1904PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

We noted probable jurisdiction to decide whether Congress may, consistent with the Fifth Amendment, forbid all involuntarily committed former mental patients to purchase firearms while permitting some felons to do so.

In 1982 appellee attempted to purchase a firearm at Ray’s Sport Shop in North Plainfield, New Jersey. The Sport Shop gave appellee a standard questionnaire, which asked, inter alia: “Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective or have you ever been committed to a mental institution?” Appellee had been involuntarily committed to a mental hospital for a period of several days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Galioto v. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & FirearmsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. David A. Clarke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  3. Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Native Village of Noatak v. Edgar Blatchford, as Commissioner, Department of Community and Regional Affairs, State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API