Legal Opinion
Binyon v. State
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 5, 1993No. B061613PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (A. M.), P. J.
Hugh Binyon (appellant) appeals the judgment of dismissal of his petition for writ of administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) for lack of prosecution. Respondents are the State of California, the California State Personnel Board and Charles W. Walter (collectively, the State).
Appellant was employed as a senior special investigator with the California Department of Consumer Affairs. In October 1985, after a hearing before the State Personnel Board, he was terminated from his position. Thereafter, on May 19,1986, appellant filed a petition for writ of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Salas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Wenzler v. Municipal Court for the Pasadena Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oskooi v. Fountain Valley Regional Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hiller v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Dept. of Forestry CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Oskooi v. Fountain Valley Regional Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Shiloh v. Value Rental Car CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2016