Frost v. Pennington
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint, from city court of Richmond county — Judge Eve. November 9, 1908.
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, O. J.
1. While as a general rule eases should be called' and tried in the order in which they are docketed, the rules of practice adopted by the trial courts regulating the assignment of cases and the making up of trial calendars will not be interfered with, unless in the application of such rules to the facts of a particular case manifest injustice has been done and the assignment of the case for trial was an abuse of discretion. Civil Code, §5658; Duggar v. Lackey, 85 Ga. 631 (11 S. E. 1025).
2. “Generally speaking, the construction placed upon its own rules by a court of original…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roberts v. KuhrtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Duggar v. LackeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Jones Mercantile Co. v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Gilbert v. Montlick & Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Perry v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Safe-Way Finance Company v. Standard Bag CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.