Legal Opinion

State v. Henley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2011No. 2008AP697-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Dimitri Henley characterizes his most recent motion to this court as a motion for reconsideration of the court's July 21, 2010 decision,1 which concluded that in circumstances such as Henley presented, circuit court judges lack the authority to grant a new trial in the interest of justice and also denied his request of this court for a new trial in the interest of justice. Henley contends that by denying him a new trial and by providing no court procedures for reviewing Justice Roggensack's decision not to recuse,2 this court has denied his right to due process under the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. In Re Hon. Charles E. KadingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Jesse L. HerrmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Polsky v. VirnichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. ProsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Ozanne v. FitzgeraldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Adams v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API