Legal Opinion

Cramer v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1 ] Diane R. Cramer (Cramer) appeals the circuit court’s decision declining to hold Murray T. Smith (Smith), her former husband, in contempt for an alleged violation of their divorce stipulation and property settlement agreement. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2 ] Cramer and Smith were divorced on June 2,1994. The divorce decree included a negotiated stipulation and agreement (agreement) setting out the property interests of Cramer and Smith in the marital assets. The principal asset of the marriage was an ownership interest in Midwest Coast Transportation, Inc. (MCT). The agreement…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Huffman v. ShevlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. LPN Trust v. Farrar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Nicolaus v. DemingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lindskov v. LindskovSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API