Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1948No. Docket No. 78, Calendar No. 43,873PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButeel, J.

Elsie Rose Miller, plaintiff and appellee, seeks separate maintenance fi;om her husband, Joseph Paul Miller, under the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 12794 [Stat. Ann. § 25.211]). The court below found that the material facts charged in the plaintiff’s bill of complaint were true, and that the defendant had been guilty of extreme and repeated cruelty to plaintiff as therein charged. The court-decreed a legal separation of the parties which decree requires the defendant to pay the plaintiff $300 a month for her support and maintenance, she to pay all of the expenses of maintaining the family…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brookhouse v. BrookhouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kolberg v. KolbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Trombley v. TrombleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Morrison v. MorrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Gindorff v. GindorffMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pierce Ex Rel. Pierce v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1969
  2. Nice v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1969
  3. Sullivan v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Guenin v. GueninMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Willmore v. Hertz Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API