Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Sullivan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1949No. Docket No. 63, Calendar No. 44,057PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff filed a petition under Act No. 243, Pub. Acts 1889 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 12794, 12795 [Stat. Ann. §§ 25.211, 25.212]), hereinafter referred to as Act No. 243. The court, after dismissing defendant’s cross bill for divorce, awarded plaintiff a decree of separate maintenance, decreeing her to be the owner of an undivided one-half interest in defendant’s share in The Checker Cab business and in defendant’s taxicabs, requiring him to turn over to plaintiff, monthly, for her separate maintenance and support, one half the net proceeds therefrom, and further decreeing that plaintiff have…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Heckathorn v. HeckathornMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Cole v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hagerty v. HagertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lacey v. LaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Judson v. JudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rose v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Blay v. BlayMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Phillips v. PhillipsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Olmstead v. OlmsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Peer v. PeerMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API