Pierce Ex Rel. Pierce v. New York Central Railroad
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
FOX, District Judge.
An ancient rule of the Michigan Supreme Court requires a five per cent reduction of future damages as determinative of present worth. 1 Rivers v. Bay City Traction & Elec. Co., 164 Mich. 696, 708, 128 N.W. 254, 259 (1910), reh. denied 164 Mich. 696, 710, 131 N.W. 86, 87 (1911). However, the same Supreme Court has also stated that inflation and the resulting diminution of a dollar may be considered. Knights of Equity Memorial Scholarship Comm. v. University of Detroit, 359 Mich. 235, 238, 102 N.W.2d 463, 465 (1960); Norman v. Thomas Theatre Corp., 349…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clifford Gowdy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Normand v. Thomas Theatre Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Gowdy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967
- Rex Pierce, Jr., a Minor by His Next Friend, Janet Pierce v. New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Rivers v. Bay City Traction & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bosak v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Hinzman v. PalmanteerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Glen Dale Steckler and Annette Steckler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Tiffany v. the Christman Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.