Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Neal

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided April 25, 1942No. 310 CivilPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, District Judge.

The question before the court arises out of the motion made by petitioner to strike from respondent’s answer all reliance upon offers made by petitioner to respondent for the land condemned, and references to and reliance upon statements or reports as to value made by petitioner’s appraisers to petitioner, and in some instances to respondent. The answer also relies upon certain geological data compiled by agents or employees of petitioner, and one such tabulation is attached to the answer as an exhibit. The answer calls upon petitioner to set out in an appropriate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Footville Condensed Milk Co. v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
  3. Carroll v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BurksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Bell v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Friedman v. City of Forest CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. United States v. Certain Acres of Land in Decatur & Seminole CountiesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1955
  3. Hickey v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. United States v. HarralsonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API