Hickey v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge.
Defendant’s objections to plaintiff’s interrogatories in the above matter are sustained.
The matter here sought is the names, addresses and positions of persons and firms from whom the defendant obtained appraisals regarding their expert opinion as to the valuation of the property in question, which is the subject of condemnation. As has often been pointed out interrogatories serve two purposes, first to ascertain facts and to procure evidence, or to secure information as to where it obtains, and second, to narrow the issues. See Aktiebolaget Vargos v. Clark, D.C., 8…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aktiebolaget Vargos v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Boynton v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
- United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. NealDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1942
3Cited by13 opinions
- Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Willey v. WhitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Martínez Rivera v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- United States v. 23.76 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- United States v. Certain Acres of Land in Decatur & Seminole CountiesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.